ISOC-AU logo
| Home | Who are we? | Membership | News | Issues | Sponsorship | Contact Us |

Report on Sydney Consumer Consultation Meeting, 19 August 2005


line

This Telecommunications Consumer Consultation Meeting was devised as a discussion and workshop following a day-long forum based on the topic of Convergence, Content, Carriage and Regulation. It was held at the Country Embassy, L44 Grosvenor Place, 225 George St, Sydney, from 9am to 5pm on 19 August 2005.

ISOC-AU would like to thank Director Cheryl Langdon-Orr for organising this event in conjunction with the Consumers' Telecommunications Network, Service Providers' Association, Australian Telecommunications Users' Group, and the NSW Department of State and Regional Development.

Participants were advised that this consultation process is supported by funding from the Department of Communications, IT and the Arts.

Forum Program

Discussion and Workshop Outcomes

Following the presentations the participants were asked to answer the simple question "To make convergence better industry/regulators/consumer groups need to ..."

To commence the session the facilitator added to the proceedings of the day with this simple diagram of "convergence."

Figure 1 - Convergence diagram

Two questions were asked:
1) Should the finance industry be included? and
2) is the real process one of divergence?

In response to the first question it was pointed out that all other industries, including agriculture, were being transformed by this activity, and finance (even micro-payments) wasn't especially different. In response to the second, the diagram showing the layering of the vertical industries was shown - concluding that each of the previously vertical industries was showing some separation between the layers.

Figure 2 - Divergence diagram

The participant responses were then clustered to identify patterns of responses. The groupings are reflected as below.

Policy and Industry

The first stand out comment was that the group is looking for "leadership" from Government. This does not mean more regulation necessarily, nor direct investment, per se. It does mean the Government being an active participant in taking these discussions forward rather than a near passive observer.

Figure 3 - Policy Strand diagram

The discussion around policy led into the areas of competition and interoperability, including for content services. And the important issue of facilitation of Australian content was discussed as a possible policy and/or funding issue for Government focus/participation.

Figure 4 - Competition

diagram

Figure 5 - Interoperability diagram

The second stand-out request was to do something about complaints handling. There is a common belief that we are not creating a "simple effective framework for complaint handling under convergence" and ultimately industry should collectively respond to this point.

Figure 6 - Complaints diagram

The next two big pieces revolved around areas where industry at least is doing some work. These were in defining Broadband standards (how we interpreted the NRP work) and the Consumer Council work on Community Impact.

Figure 7 - Broadband diagram

Consumer Community Requirements

Figure 8 - Information diagram

Figure 9 - Affordability diagram

Figure 10 - Accessibility diagram

The overall messages of the day were:

Report of outcomes and diagrams: Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Honorary Treasurer ISOC-AU, August 2005

Tony Hill
President, ISOC-AU
January 2006

line

| Home | Who are we? | Membership | News | Issues | Sponsorship | Contact Us |

line